The power
of Jalis and their structure of feeling have different effects on different
people, audiences, nations. It can
inspire pride or remind them of their history and legacy or simply be enjoyed
for its musical mastery. The jalis incorporate
different musical styles and seek many avenues to distribute their music to
different audiences, but by incorporating so many different styles and trying
to appease so many audiences, are jalis losing the initial aspects of their
art? Are they becoming too globalized,
moving away from what Jaliya music was supposed to be? Or like Diawara said, is praising the people
and the feeling of the past keeping West African from moving forward, and that revitalizing
Jayila for modern ears is better for the tradition?
Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Ebron Review
Ebron’s main point is this section is that “African music
is a music of encounters,” that its music crosses the boundaries of politics,
nationalism, and continents. The encounters
are the combination of performers, audiences, and producers, who distribute
their music. These encounters lead to
different interpretation and understanding of their music, which affects the
structure of feeling of their music, which is how performers play their music
and how the audience participates in it.
This can lead to want performers play where, what audiences listen to
their music, and where producers distribute them. Ebron focuses on the Jalis of West African,
specifically those in Gambia. In West
African, the jalis are used as a political maneuver to unite different people,
support policies, and instill nationalism and pride. On the other hand, in American, jalis was
seen as music of African roots, especially by African Americans. Both structures of feelings are similar in
that they both admire and complexity of the music, but the outcome and the way they
are received are different.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment